Comparing and Contrasting the Stories of Polyphemus and Tepegöz Literature Essay Samples

Looking into the Stories of Polyphemus and Tepegöz Mammoths, beasts, and other legendary animals are apparently omnipresent all through Eastern and Western old stories. These figures are regularly delineated as man-eating devilish elements, and it is up to the legends to stop them. In spite of the fact that mammoths are massively incredible, they are at last vanquished by the saints. Homer's Odyssey and the Turkish epic Book of Dede Korkut are only two instances of writing that show this kind of collaboration. Thusly, it is valuable to assess the similitudes and contrasts between these two accounts. In the two stories, there is a battle among great and insidiousness. In The Odyssey, Odysseus must figure out how to vanquish Polyphemus. In like manner, in the Book of Dede Korkut, Basat faces Tepegöz so as to secure his kin. This common idea is critical on the grounds that it speaks to a part of human instinct. Besides, the legends in the two accounts must experience a progression of preliminaries before crushing the monster. For instance, the principal test for Odysseus and his men is the Cicones. Odysseus and his men at first annihilation the Cicones. In any case, his men demand receiving the rewards of their loot and decline to leave. This gives enough an ideal opportunity for the Cicones to refocus and drive Odysseus and his men out to the ocean and to the place that is known for the Lotus-eaters. It is fascinating to take note of that the Lotus-eaters themselves are of no threat to Odysseus and his men. In lines 106 to 110, Odysseus reviews, Any crew members who ate the lotus , the nectar sweet organic product, lost all longing to communicate something specific back, considerably less return, their solitary wish was to wait there with the Lotus-eaters, brushing on lotus, all memory of the excursion home broke down for eternity. Similarly, Basat needed to experience a progression of tests before at last executing Tepegöz too. Tepegöz tried Basat with the ring, the fortune house, and the blades. In every one of the three preliminaries, Basat never let Tepegöz improve of him. For instance, when Basat entered the cavern to recover the exposed blade, he saw that the stripped blade was going here and there. When Basat drew his own blade and held it against the bare sword, it sawed his own sword into two. So as to get the blade, Basat shot a bolt at the chain by which the sword was hanging. Not exclusively did these tests speak to the development of the saints however it likewise permitted the legends to pick up the fearlessness and shrewdness that they expe cted to vanquish the goliaths. Besides, the accentuation that the two works places on religion gives the peruser understanding into the convictions of the old Greeks and Turks. For instance, in The Odyssey, expressions, for example, and Zeus gave us fiasco… , (61) Presently Zeus who masses the tempest mists hit the armada with the North Wind, (76-77) and We flung our arms to Zeus (331) show that the Greeks put themselves in the benevolence of the divine beings. They accepted that the divine beings assumed a huge job in their day by day lives. In the Book of Dede Korkut, Basat rehashes the expression, My Allah spared me. This infers the Turks accepted that Allah was tolerant. All things considered, the consistent reference to religion demonstrates that it assumed a key job in Greek and Turkish societies. Regardless of the various equals between these two artistic works, there are likewise contrasts. For example, the strategy where the legends rout the beasts are unique. Odysseus gets Polyphemus alcoholic and fools the monster into believing that his adversary's name is Nobody. Later on, Polyphemus claims that Nobody is assaulting him, yet different mammoths misconstrue and imagine that Polyphemus is really being rebuffed by the divine beings. Then again, Basat executes Tepegöz through sheer power. In addition, Odysseus and Basat had to some degree various goals. Albeit both can be considered legends, Odysseus battles the goliath for experience while Basat battles for his kin. Odysseus' unique expectation was to take food from the monster's nest. Be that as it may, when they got the food, Odysseus will not leave since he expected endowments from Polyphemus. In lines 256 and 258, he concedes that he would not give way and pondered what endowments he'd give. These lines are critical on the grounds that they diagram the old Greeks' accentuation on neighborliness. At the point when Odysseus understands that the goliath had no feeling of ethical quality and didn't fear the divine beings, he attempts to get away. Despite what might be expected, Basat faces the monster without anticipating anything consequently. He is now mindful of the staggering disarray that Tepegöz causes. Basat doesn't attempt to get away and readily settles on the decision to hazard his life for his family and his locale. On page 128, Basat says, Beys, I am going to meet Tepegöz for my sibling. What's your opinion about this? This sentence tells the peruser that Basat regards and qualities the assessments of his family. He is eager to put his own life in danger to retaliate for his sibling. This shows the Turks put an accentuation on the significance of family. At the point when these two stories are thought about, it becomes obvious that there is a connection among Greek and Turkish culture and fables. It is additionally critical to take note of that accounts are regularly adjusted or changed starting with one age then onto the next. Be that as it may, the quintessence of the story remains. The idea of good and underhandedness is a work of art and will keep on remaining so. Obviously the battle among legend and beast is one of the most significant parts of the abstract world.